Nancy Pelosi and Margaret Sanger

January 26, 2009

nancy-pelosi-attacks According to Nancy Pelosi adding birth control funding to the new economic “stimulus” package is needed because “Contraception is a good thing because it will reduce the costs of the state and federal government in providing services.”

Stop and think about that for a minute, to whom are state and federal government health services provided?

Here’s a hint: Those services are not provided to people that look like Nancy Pelosi.

“The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.” (Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood)

Wake up America.


Sir Arthur Keith’s Tribute to Charles Dawson

January 26, 2009

“The fossil remains found at Piltdown by Mr. Dawson set students of man’s evolution the most difficult task that has confronted them hitherto. In his characterization, Piltdown Man was quite unlike any fossil type known to us. Sir Arthur Smith Woodward was impressed by his simian similarities; I, on the other hand, was impressed by those features which, as I thought then, were eminently human and modern. Hence arose those discrepancies between us–discrepancies of a quarter of a century ago.

Since then, much has happened. Discoveries are being made which help to throw Piltdown man into his proper place in the crowded throng of evolving human forms. We now know that when the Piltdown type was being evolved in England–or at the western end of the Old World–a totally different type had come into being in the Eastern lands of the Old World. The Eastern types had low receding foreheads, modelled as in the gorilla and chimpanzee. The Western or Piltdown type differed; it had a relatively upright and high forehead modelled not on gorilla lines but rather on those of the organg. While the Eastern forms retained in their shape of head the low squat type of the chimpanzee and gorilla, the Western or Piltdown type tended to assume the higher vaulted skull seen in modern races. There is no denying that in many of his features Piltdown man foreshadowed some of the structural modifications we find in modern races of mankind. Sir Arthur Smith Woodward, I know, will agree with me as to how Piltdown man came by such features; he came by them independently, for discoveries of recent years have proved that diverse races of mankind have undergone the same structural change quite independently of each other. And there is also no denying that through all his known parts there runs a simian vein in Piltdown man, in his skull and brain as well as is in his mandible.”

Excerpt (emphasis added) from the 1938 speech by noted evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith on the occasion of the unveiling of a memorial in honor of Charles Dawson on the spot where Piltdown Man was “discovered”.

Piltdown Man, you may recall, was one of the most famous paleontological hoaxes of history. It only took the combined brain power of leading evolutionists 40 years to conclude that the Piltdown “fossil” was actually a composite of a human skull, the jaw of an orangutan, and the filed down teeth of a chimpanzee. As events turned out, Sir Keith was partially right though, its just that it took until 1958 for Piltdown Man to take its proper place along side all the other imaginary proofs of human evolution.


Chronicles of The Obamanation #1

January 24, 2009

Obama Creepy Change

Creepy Change: A chronicle of America’s continued descent into idolatry in the era of Barack Obama.

 

Number of Days in the Whitehouse: 4

 

1. Triumphal entry of the Obama Idol

2. Pledge to be Obama’s Servant


Darwinists Throw Atheists Another Curve Ball

January 13, 2009

While some evolutionists seem content to abandoned science to explain evolution, others seem more willing to explore Intelligent Design even if they can’t admit to it.

Quote from “Preexisting Evolutionary Potential” now a Scientific Fact:

A recent multidisciplinary study on the two-phase increase in the size of life has concluded that there must exist a “preexisting evolutionary potential” to explain the sudden increase in size and complexity which occurred twice in the history of life, both times following increases in atmospheric oxygen.

What exactly this “evolutionary potential” was is not speculated upon. The presence of latent genetic programs is certainly the most obvious explanation. Darwinists of course are unable to offer this obvious possibility. They would then have to explain where those programs might have come from. They would then be branded ID Creationists and lose their jobs.

When Darwinism’s fallacy filled facade finally falls there’s no telling what new belief atheists will gravitate to in order to rationalize their continued denial of God but I suspect Dawkins’ space-alien-creator notion is looking better to them all the time.


A Contrast In Values

January 13, 2009

At the same time that the atheistic government of what may well be the world’s most Christian nation has launched a campaign against digital pornography to help protect its citizens, the U.K. company Eidos will soon start targeting digital porn at children (with, no doubt, government protection) to help stave off financial failure.

Meanwhile, so called ‘free speech’ advocates (especially in the U.S.) will probably decry the actions of the Chinese government while snapping up the pornographic version of Tomb Raider in record numbers. Talk about a contrast in values.


Gene Robinson Acknowledges Idolatry

January 13, 2009

The first openly gay bishop in the Episcopal Church, Robinson’s 2003 election caused a rift in the church, provoking several dioceses and dozens of parishes to secede in protest. Though he’d been an early public supporter of Obama, Robinson called the inaugural invitation to Warren “a slap in the face.”

“I’m all for Rick Warren being at the table,” Robinson told the New York Times. “But we’re not talking about a discussion; we’re talking about putting someone up front and center at what will be the most watched inauguration in history, and asking his blessing on the nation. And the God that he’s praying to is not the God that I know.”

Mr. Robinson’s recognition that he prays to a different god than the God to whom Rick Warren prays may also have been accompanied by a hint about the god he has decided to worship when he went on to state in a related email:

“It will be an enormous honor to offer prayers for the country and the new president, standing on the holy ground where the ‘I have a dream speech’ was delivered by Dr. King,”

Fortunately for the rest of us, Mr. Robinson did not provide any other clarifying details about the idol he created in his own image and to whom he prays.

(Source: US News, emphsis added)


The Shame of Those Who Trust in Idols

January 12, 2009

Don’t follow the customs of those nations who become frightened when they see something strange happen in the sky. Their religion is worthless! They chop down a tree, carve the wood into an idol, cover it with silver and gold, and then nail it down so it won’t fall over. An idol is no better than a scarecrow. It can’t speak, and it has to be carried, because it can’t walk. Why worship an idol that can’t help or harm you? (Jeremiah 10:2-5, CEV)

They will be turned back and be utterly put to shame, who trust in idols… (Isaiah 42:17, NASB)

Aren’t you glad?


Rule of Prayer

January 12, 2009

by John Calvin

1. Let the first rule of right prayer then be, to have our heart and mind framed as becomes those who are entering into converse with God. This we shall accomplish in regard to the mind, if, laying aside carnal thoughts and cares which might interfere with the direct and pure contemplation of God, it not only be wholly intent on prayer, but also, as far as possible, be borne and raised above itself. I do not here insist on a mind so disengaged as to feel none of the gnawings of anxiety; on the contrary, it is by much anxiety that the fervor of prayer is inflamed.

2. Another rule of prayer is, that in asking we must always truly feel our wants, and seriously considering that we need all the things which we ask, accompany the prayer with a sincere, nay, ardent desire of obtaining them.

3. The third rule to be added is: that he who comes into the presence of God to pray must divest himself of all vainglorious thoughts, lay aside all idea of worth; in short, discard all self-confidence, humbly giving God the whole glory, lest by arrogating anything, however little, to himself, vain pride cause him to turn away his face.

4. The fourth rule of prayer is, that notwithstanding of our being thus abased and truly humbled, we should be animated to pray with the sure hope of succeeding.

Excerpt from Of Prayer — A Perpetual Exercise Of Faith. The Daily Benefits Derived From It.


John Piper Reciting Romans 8

January 12, 2009

 

Link: If My Words Abide in You by John Piper.


Barabbas

January 9, 2009

(Via Caleb & Sol)